How to treat
acute gall bladder infection?
As soon as
patient come Initial treatment with antibiotics active against enteric bacteria
should begin.
The definitive
treatment for acute gall bladder inflammation (acute cholecystitis) is
cholecystectomy. From the time this operation was first performed in 1882 by
Langenbuch, open cholecystectomy has been the standard of care for patients
with acute cholecystitis. With the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in
the 1980s, the standard approach has changed such that cholecystectomy is now
routinely performed laparoscopically.
Only issue is
timing of surgery.
The conversion
rate to an open procedure is higher for patients with acute cholecystitis
compared with patients undergoing elective operations but most patients with
acute cholecystitis (>80%) can undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy
successfully.
Laparoscopic
subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC) has also been evaluated as a means of decreasing
the conversion rate to open procedure in patients with acute cholecystitis This procedure involves leaving the wall of
the gallbladder when it is significantly difficult to dissect from the liver
bed, Indeed, in the face of severe inflammatory change, such an approach is
safter than risking injury .Horiuchi and colleagues (2008) demonstrated a significant decrease in
conversion rate to open procedure with the use of these techniques with no
increase in postoperative complications. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains
the standard therapy for definitive treatment of patients with acute
cholecystitis, with conversion to an open procedure if necessary.
In patients with
a high perioperative risk from sepsis or other underlying medical
comorbidities, initial treatment of acute cholecystitis with percutaneous tube
placement is preferred, These tubes can be placed using either sonographic or
CT guidance. This procedure effectively decompresses the gallbladder,
evacuating the infected bile and relieving the pain associated with gallbladder
distension, and it is associated with a low complication rate After
stabilization of the patient, and if the clinical situation otherwise warrants,
delayed cholecystectomy should be performed, which often can be done
laparoscopically. Akyürek and colleagues (2005) demonstrated decreased hospital stay and
cost in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy followed by
early laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with those treated conservatively
with intravenous (IV) antibiotics and bowel rest followed by delayed cholecystectomy.
Timing of Surgery
The optimal
interval of time between the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis and definitive
treatment with cholecystectomy has been the subject of many prospective
randomized trials, nine evaluating open cholecystectomy and five evaluating laparoscopic
cholecystectomy. The concern in operating on patients with early cholecystitis
(typically defined as <3 days) is the potential for increased postoperative
complications, including common bile duct injury. The risk of performing
cholecystectomy late (weeks after the diagnosis of cholecystitis) is that a
subset of patients have recurrent symptoms during the period between diagnosis
and surgical treatment, which leads to recurrent hospital admissions and urgent
surgery .In multiple randomized prospective trials evaluating the timing of
open cholecystectomy, patients undergoing early operation experienced no
increased perioperative complications and had a shorter length of hospital stay
compared with patients undergoing delayed operation.
The majority
of trials of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy define “early”
as within 72 hours of symptom onset. A recent nonrandomized, prospective study
by Tzovaras and colleagues (2006) assessed 129 patients undergoing
laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis during the index
admission. The patients were divided into three groups regarding the timing of
their surgery from symptom onset: within 3 days, between 4 and 7 days, and
after 7 days. They found no significant difference in conversion rate, or
postoperative hospital stay among these groups and thus suggest that the benefits
of early cholecystectomy are not limited to patients who present within 72
hours of symptom onset.
Take home
points:
·
Cholecystectomy
preferably laproscopic is gold standard treatment.
·
If
expertise available early cholecystectomy should be done.
·
There
is no hard and fast timing for cholecystectomy should be decided upon patient
condition and expertise available.
·
Percutaneous
cholecystectomy should be done in septic/sick patients not suitable for
surgery.
·
Subtotal
or partial cholecystectomy should be considered as a option before converting
to open
·
End
of the day goal should be to treat the patient and not the way or approach.
No comments:
Post a Comment